Page 30 - A Gender-Sensitive Indian Foreign Policy- Why? and How?
P. 30

Indian Council
                                                                                        of World Affairs

                        participation in the country, especially at the panchayat level. A statement
                        made last year noted, for instance, India’s ‘experience of mainstreaming
                        women’s leadership and political participation will continue to inspire
                        India’s actions.’ It has generally refrained from drawing attention to regional
                        concerns or violence within the country at the WPS opening meetings; some
                        exceptions here are references to cross-border terrorism and its impact on
                        women, and a 2019 statement that recalled ‘appalling atrocities perpetrated
                        with impunity against women by the armed forces of a State’. This was in
                        relation to the 1971 Bangladesh war. I am ambivalent about the need for a
                        National Action Plan, but there ought to be greater attention to gender and
                        security issues within the country in order to strengthen India’s legitimacy to
                        talk about gender at international forums.

                        Second, any discussion on India and the Security Council gets caught up
                        in the debates around its long-standing campaign for a permanent seat.
                        While this goal is important, such Charter changes are extremely difficult
                        to realize. I’d be happy to discuss this further in the Q&A session. India
                        should instead devote additional resources towards having a greater voice
                        in decision-making at the Security Council (more broadly), as it has sought
                        to do in relation to peace operations. I have more to say on this international
                        aspect, especially the challenges that come up. For instance, Brazil’s
                        approach to commanding MINUSTAH was well-received in Haiti, but did not
                        give it the international mileage that it had hoped for with its efforts to do
                        peacekeeping differently.  India would need to balance its different interests,
                                                8
                        as it moves forward with a gender sensitive foreign policy. Certainly, greater
                        engagement with gender, including aspects of the WPS agenda, is both
                        timely and sensible. Thanks very much.


         Amb. Nirupama   Thank you, Soumita that was absolutely fascinating. These discussion points
        Menon Rao (Chair   on women in peace and security and the way forward for India and the
           and Moderator)
                        manner in which the Indian approach has also been evolving, I think you
                        presented it in a very nuanced fashion, you know, the threats to international
                        peace and security, our peace building operations, the protection pillar
                        and now possibly a prevention pillar also. So this is something I think that
                        necessitates in-depth discussion, but thank you once again for making
                        those points.

                        In the interest of time I think we’ll have to now move on to our next speaker
                        Dr. Bindulakshami Pattadath, Associate Professor at the Advanced Centre
                        for Women’s Studies at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences, Mumbai. Her
                        research interests are in the area of gender studies, labour, transnational
                        migration, health and disability. She has years of experience in doing


         30             8  de Paula, Francine Rossone (2019) ‘Brazil’s non-indifference: a case for a feminist diplomatic agenda or geopoli-
                         tics as usual?’ International Feminist Journal of Politics, 21:1.



                       Indian Council of World Affairs                           An ICWA Conversation
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35